I remember Bush

I remember people criticizing former President Bush for sending troops to Iraq because he claimed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. When the war was over and Saddam was apprehended there was a big search for these weapons but none were found.  Then people were accusing Bush for starting a war on the pretense that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Now I guess we know that Saddam had those weapons.

I can see now that President Bush was blamed for a lot of things that he was not guilty of and is still being blamed even to this day. He also made a prediction that if all the troops were taken out of Iraq that the terrorists would start all over again in that country. 

Now that Obama has taken all those troops out, things are getting worse than before. Yes troops were taken out by a supposed-to-be-a-president who thinks that he knows everything.  At least by his actions that’s what he would like others to think: that he is the way, he is the person that would save the USA. He reminds me of the now deceased former Prime Minister of  Canada Pierre Elliot Trudeau who gave our nation away with his multiculturalism garbage.

Former president Bush has been accused of a lot of things that he was not guilty of but he knew what he was talking about. I must also say that no terrorists would think of getting away with beheading an American citizen and believing that nothing will be done about it like what is going on now.

That’s my rant of the day.

Keystone XL pipeline

According to what I’ve read, it seems by the way that it’s written that Obama is the only one to blame for not giving the okay for the pipe line. I would disagree with that thinking. I would rather think that some Democrats and Republicans might have some interest with some competitors and are willing to sacrifice the creation of jobs for the American people because of their greed for money.

I would say it would be safe for them to blame Obama. It seems to have become a fad on blaming him for almost everything that has gone wrong since he was elected. Myself, I wouldn’t trust him. Could it be that because of his yes men, he hesitates to put his name on the dotted line as he wouldn’t want to offend anyone? 

If what I’m claiming the reasons to be for Keystone XL not going ahead are true, then it’s true that some people have no regards for the welfare of the nation, preferring to serve their own wallet.  These sorts of people have no business being in a position where they can put themselves ahead of the good of the nation.

Obama has done enough things he can be blamed for and doesn’t need any help to be partly blamed for something that he might want to do.

That is my rant and my opinions of the day.

Obama, not Bush is to blame for the scandal

The other morning I did as usual do and checked out the site Nonsensible Shoes and I spotted the name of Bush the former president of the USA.  I was interested in finding out what he was getting blame for now. 

He’s getting blamed for having started the snooping of the citizens but it wasn’t blown up like it is now. I will admit Bush did start it, but all the scandals and lies and cover ups with the Obama administration makes it more suspicious because the trust for Obama  is a thing of the past. And still he’s not interested in doing or saying anything that could bring at least some little trust to his administration and to himself.

With all the things that were said and the way the administration is operating it looks like the person that was elected as commander in chief is only on there for the ride and what he can get out of it.

That's my rant of the day.

Boston Marathon bombing is the US fault?

I came across this last week:

A United Nations official known for blaming the U.S. for unrest in the Middle East has angered critics again by blaming the Boston Marathon bombings on “American global domination.”

"The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world," Richard Falk, the UN Human Rights Council's Palestine monitor, wrote in an article for Foreign Policy Journal titled, “A Commentary on the Marathon Murders."

"It is soon to tell, and the somewhat hysterical Boston dragnet for the remaining at large and alive suspect does suggest that the wounds of 9/11 are far from healed," he wrote. "We should be asking ourselves at this moment, 'How many canaries will have to die before we awaken from our geopolitical fantasy of global domination?'”

Is the U.S. really to blame for their citizens being killed like this fellow at the U.N. says? What do you think? I know what I think.